Methods
AcknowledgePendingMessages | (au: IDs) | → | nothing | |
SendMessage | (aa{sv}: Message, u: Flags) | → | s: Token |
Signals
MessageSent | (aa{sv}: Content, u: Flags, s: Message_Token) | |
PendingMessagesRemoved | (au: Message_IDs) | |
MessageReceived | (aa{sv}: Message) |
Properties
SupportedContentTypes | as | Read only | Immutable | |
MessageTypes | au (Channel_Text_Message_Type_List) | Read only | Immutable | |
MessagePartSupportFlags | u (Message_Part_Support_Flags) | Read only | Immutable | |
PendingMessages | aaa{sv} (Message_Part_List_List) | Read only | ||
DeliveryReportingSupport | u (Delivery_Reporting_Support_Flags) | Read only | Immutable |
Types
Message_ID | Simple Type | u | |
Message_Header_Key | Simple Type | s | |
Message_Body_Key | Simple Type | s | |
Delivery_Report_Header_Key | Simple Type | s | |
Protocol_Message_Token | Simple Type | s | |
Protocol_Content_Identifier | Simple Type | s | |
Channel_Text_Send_Error | Enum | u | |
Channel_Text_Message_Type | Enum | u | |
Delivery_Status | Enum | u | |
Message_Part_Support_Flags | Flags | u | |
Message_Sending_Flags | Flags | u | |
Delivery_Reporting_Support_Flags | Flags | u | |
Message_Part | Mapping | a{sv} |
Description
A channel type for sending and receiving messages. This channel type is primarily used for textual messages, but can also be used for more general messages, including:
- messages with attachments (like MIME multipart/mixed)
- groups of alternatives (like MIME multipart/alternative)
- delivery reports, adding support for protocols where the message content is not echoed back to the sender on failure and for receiving positive acknowledgements, as well as ensuring that incoming delivery reports are not lost if no client is handling the channel yet;
- any extra types of message we need in future
Incoming messages, outgoing messages, and delivery reports are all represented as lists of Message_Part structures, with a format reminiscent of e-mail.
When a message is received, an identifier is assigned and a MessageReceived signal emitted, and the message is placed in a pending queue represented by the PendingMessages property. When the Handler for a channel has handled the message by showing it to the user (or equivalent), it should acknowledge the receipt of that message using the AcknowledgePendingMessages method, and the message will then be removed from the pending queue. Numeric identifiers for received messages may be reused over the lifetime of the channel. Only the Handler for a channel should acknowledge messages; Observers (such as loggers) and Approvers for the channel may listen for incoming messages, and send messages of their own, but SHOULD NOT acknowledge messages.
Rationale:
If observers were allowed to acknowledge messages, then messages might have been acknowledged before the handler even got to see the channel, and hence could not be shown to the user.
Sending messages can be requested using the SendMessage method, which will return successfully when the message has been submitted for sending, or return an error with no signal emission if there is an immediate failure. If a message is submitted for sending but delivery of the message later fails, this is indicated by a delivery report, which is received in the same way as an incoming message. Outgoing messages are announced to other clients which may be interested in the channel by the MessageSent signal.
Simple one-to-one chats (such as streams of private messages in XMPP or IRC) should be represented by a Text channel whose TargetHandleType is Contact. The expected way to request such a channel is to set the ChannelType, TargetHandleType, and either TargetHandle or TargetID in a call to EnsureChannel.
Named chat rooms whose identity can be saved and used again later (IRC channels, Jabber MUCs) are expected to be represented by Text channels with TargetHandleType = Room and the Group1 interface. In protocols where a chatroom can be used as a continuation of one or more one-to-one chats, these channels should also have the Conference1 interface.
Unnamed, transient chat rooms which cannot be rejoined by their unique identifier (e.g. a conversation on MSN which has, or once had, three or more participants) are expected to be represented by Text channels with TargetHandleType = None (and hence TargetHandle = 0), Group1 interface, and optionally the Conference1 interface.
On protocols like MSN where a conversation with a user is actually just a nameless chat room starting with exactly two members, to which more members can be invited, the initial one-to-one conversation SHOULD be represented with TargetHandleType = Contact. If a third participant joins or is invited, this SHOULD be represented by signalling a new Conference1 channel with the one-to-one channel in its InitialChannels, migrating the underlying protocol object from the one-to-one channel to the Conference channel, and creating a new protocol-level conversation if the one-to-one channel is re-used. See the Conference interface for more details.
Rationale:
This keeps the presentation of all one-to-one conversations uniform, and makes it easier to hand over a conversation from a 1-1-specific UI to a more elaborate multi-user UI; while it does require UIs to understand Conference to follow the upgrade, UIs that will deal with XMPP need to understand Conference anyway.
If a channel of type Text is closed while it has pending messages, the connection manager MUST allow this, but SHOULD open a new channel to deliver those messages, signalling it as a new channel with the NewChannels signal. The new channel should resemble the old channel, but have Requested = FALSE regardless of its previous value; the InitiatorHandle and InitiatorID should correspond to the sender of one of the pending messages.
Rationale:
In effect, this turns this situation, in which a client is likely to lose messages:
- UI window is closed
- message arrives
- text channel emits Received
- UI calls Close on text channel before it has seen the Received signal
- text channel emits Closed and closes
into something nearly equivalent to this situation, which is fine:
- UI window is closed
- UI calls Close on text channel
- text channel emits Closed and closes
- message arrives
- new text channel is created, connection emits NewChannels
- (the same or a different) UI handles it
Requested must be set to FALSE so the replacement channel will be handled by something.
In practice, connection managers usually implement this by keeping the same internal object that represented the old channel, adjusting its properties, signalling that it was closed, then immediately re-signalling it as a new channel.
As a result, Text channels SHOULD implement Channel.Interface.Destroyable1.
Rationale:
This "respawning" behaviour becomes problematic if there is no suitable handler for Text channels, or if a particular message repeatedly crashes the Text channel handler; a channel dispatcher can't just Close() the channel in these situations, because it will come back.
In these situations, the channel dispatcher needs a last-resort way to destroy the channel and stop it respawning. It could either acknowledge the messages itself, or use the Destroyable interface; the Destroyable interface has the advantage that it's not channel-type-dependent, so the channel dispatcher only has to understand one extra interface, however many channel types eventually need a distinction between Close and Destroy.
Opaquely-named rejoinable chatrooms (such as Skype rooms) are represented using the properties in the Room1 interface. Instructions and examples of how to request such channels are given in said interface's description.
Although this specification supports formatted (rich-text) messages with unformatted alternatives, implementations SHOULD NOT attempt to send formatted messages until the Telepathy specification has also been extended to cover capability discovery for message formatting.
Rationale:
Methods
AcknowledgePendingMessages (au: IDs) → nothing
Parameters
- IDs — au (Message_ID_List)
Possible Errors
- Invalid Argument
SendMessage (aa{sv}: Message, u: Flags) → s: Token
Parameters
- Message — aa{sv} (Message_Part_List)
- Flags — u (Message_Sending_Flags)
message-sender
, message-sender-id
,
message-sent
, message-received
,
pending-message-id
.
Returns
- Token — s (Protocol_Message_Token)
Submit a message to the server for sending. If this method returns successfully, the message has been submitted to the server and the MessageSent signal is emitted.
This method MUST return before the MessageSent signal is emitted.
Rationale:
This means that the process sending the message is the first to see the Protocol_Message_Token, and can relate the message to the corresponding MessageSent signal by comparing message tokens (if supported by the protocol).
If this method fails, message submission to the server has failed and no signal on this interface (or the Text interface) is emitted.
If this method succeeds, message submission to the server has
succeeded, but the message has not necessarily reached its intended
recipient. If a delivery failure is detected later, this is
signalled by receiving a message whose message-type
header maps to
Delivery_Report.
Similarly, if delivery is detected to have been successful
(which is not possible in all protocols), a successful delivery
report will be signalled.
Possible Errors
- Invalid Argument
- Not Available
- Permission Denied
- Network Error
Signals
MessageSent (aa{sv}: Content, u: Flags, s: Message_Token)
Parameters
- Content — aa{sv} (Message_Part_List)
- Flags — u (Message_Sending_Flags)
- Message_Token — s (Protocol_Message_Token)
The message content (see Message_Part for full details). If the message that was passed to SendMessage has a formatted text part that the connection manager recognises, but no text/plain alternative, the CM MUST use the formatted text part to generate a text/plain alternative which is also included in this signal argument.
The connection manager SHOULD include the
message-sender
, message-sender-id
and
message-sent
headers in the representation of the
message that is signalled here. If the channel has
channel-specific handles, the message-sender
and
message-sender-id
SHOULD reflect the sender that
other contacts will see.
If the connection manager can predict that the message will be altered during transmission, this argument SHOULD reflect what other contacts will receive, rather than being a copy of the argument to SendMessage (if the message is truncated, formatting or alternatives are dropped, etc., then the edited version SHOULD appear in this signal).
Flags affecting how the message was sent. The flags might be a subset of those passed to SendMessage if the caller requested unsupported flags.
Signals that a message has been submitted for sending.
This SHOULD be emitted as soon as the CM determines it's theoretically possible to send the message (e.g. the parameters are supported and correct).
Rationale:
This signal allows a process that is not the caller of SendMessage to log sent messages.
PendingMessagesRemoved (au: Message_IDs)
Parameters
- Message_IDs — au (Message_ID_List)
Rationale:
MessageReceived (aa{sv}: Message)
Parameters
- Message — aa{sv} (Message_Part_List)
The message content, including any attachments or alternatives. If the incoming message contains formatted text without a plain text alternative, the connection manager MUST generate a text/plain alternative from the formatted text, and include it in this message (both here, and in the PendingMessages property).
Properties
SupportedContentTypes — as
A list of MIME types supported by this channel, with more preferred MIME types appearing earlier in the list. The list MAY include "*/*" to indicate that attachments with arbitrary MIME types can be sent. This list MUST NOT be empty, since all implementations MUST accept messages containing a single "text/plain" part.
Items in this list MUST be normalized to lower-case.
Some examples of how this property interacts with the MessagePartSupportFlags:
- A simple IM implementation: only plain text messages are allowed
- SupportedContentTypes = ['text/plain'], MessagePartSupportFlags = 0
- Formatted text with a plain text alternative is allowed (see the HTML interface draft)
- SupportedContentTypes = ['text/html', 'text/plain'], MessagePartSupportFlags = 0
- JPEG or PNG images may be sent, but without any attached text
- SupportedContentTypes = ['text/plain', 'image/jpeg', 'image/png'], MessagePartSupportFlags = 0
- Unformatted text to which an optional JPEG or PNG image may be attached
- SupportedContentTypes = ['text/plain', 'image/jpeg', 'image/png'], MessagePartSupportFlags = One_Attachment
- Formatted text to which arbitrarily many images may be attached
- SupportedContentTypes = ['text/html', 'text/plain', 'image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/x-ms-bmp'], MessagePartSupportFlags = One_Attachment | Multiple_Attachments
- A full SIP implementation: arbitrary MIME messages are allowed
- SupportedContentTypes = ['*/*'], MessagePartSupportFlags = One_Attachment | Multiple_Attachments
MessageTypes — au (Channel_Text_Message_Type_List)
A list of message types which may be sent on this channel.
MessagePartSupportFlags — u (Message_Part_Support_Flags)
PendingMessages — aaa{sv} (Message_Part_List_List)
A list of incoming messages that have neither been acknowledged nor rejected. Its items can be removed using AcknowledgePendingMessages.
Change notification is via MessageReceived and PendingMessagesRemoved.
DeliveryReportingSupport — u (Delivery_Reporting_Support_Flags)
Types
Message_ID — u
Message_Header_Key — s
Well-known keys for the first Message_Part of a message, which contains metadata about the message as a whole, along with the corresponding value types. Some keys make sense for both incoming and outgoing messages, while others are only meaningful for one or the other.
- message-token (s - Protocol_Message_Token)
-
An opaque identifier for the message, as used by the underlying protocol. For outgoing messages, this SHOULD be globally unique; for incoming messages, this is not guaranteed to uniquely identify a message, even within the scope of a single channel or contact; the only guarantee made is that two messages with different message-token headers are different messages.
Clients wishing to determine whether a new message with the scrollback header matches a previously-logged message with the same message-token SHOULD compare the message's sender, contents, message-sent or message-received timestamp, etc. Note that, in XMPP, the server only supplies a timestamp for scrollback messages, not for messages received while you are in a room; thus, non-scrollback messages will lack a message-sent timestamp.
Rationale:
In practice, most protocols do not provide globally-unique identifiers for messages. Connection managers, being stateless, do not have the necessary information — namely, IM logs — to generate reliable unique tokens for messages.
For instance, some XMPP clients (including Gabble) stamp messages they send with unique identifiers, but others number outgoing messages in a conversation from 1 upwards.
- message-sent (x - Unix_Timestamp64)
- The time the message was sent (if unavailable, the time it arrived at a central server MAY be used). Omitted if no reasonable approximation is available; SHOULD always be present on outgoing messages.
- message-received (x - Unix_Timestamp64)
- The time the message was received locally. SHOULD always be present.
- message-sender (u - Contact_Handle)
- The contact who sent the message. If 0 or omitted, the contact who sent the message could not be determined.
- message-sender-id (s)
- The identifier of the contact who sent the message,
i.e. the result of calling InspectHandles
on
message-sender
. If omitted, clients MUST fall back to looking atmessage-sender
. - sender-nickname (s)
- The nickname chosen by the sender of the message, which can be different for each message in a conversation.
- message-type (u - Channel_Text_Message_Type)
- The type of message; if omitted, Channel_Text_Message_Type_Normal MUST be assumed. MAY be omitted for normal chat messages.
- supersedes (s – Protocol_Message_Token)
- If present, this message supersedes a previous message,
identified by its message-token header. The user
interface MAY, for example, choose to replace the superseded
message with this message, or grey out the superseded message.
Connection Managers SHOULD represent repeatedly edited messages in the following form:
Rationale:
Skype, for example, allows the user to amend messages they have already sent (to correct typos, etc.).message {token = a}; message {token = b, supersedes = a}; message {token = c, supersedes = a};
Clients should deal gracefully if the original message gets lost, but one or more corrections to it get through:Rationale:
The alternative form is:message {token = a}; message {token = b, supersedes = a}; message {token = c, supersedes = b};
but it is more difficult to implement in UIs/loggers, and it breaks irrecoverably if message b is lost. If a CM is forced to use this form, it should be tested extensively for interoperability with existing clients.message {token = x} gets lost; message {token = y, supersedes = x}; message {token = z, supersedes = x};
Rationale:
This is the form that CMs will use to mean "I know that this message was edited, but I don't know what it originally said." It is often in the interests of the remote side for message x to be lost (e.g. to hide embarassing mistakes or sensitive information) so it might not be possible to retrieve it (even on protocols with reliable message-delivery guarantees). - original-message-sent (x - Unix_Timestamp64)
- The message-sent header of the message that this one supersedes. This key should only be present if supersedes is also present. It MAY be used as a hint to help clients locate the original message in its logs. If present, comparing the tuple (original-message-sent, supersedes) with (message-sent, message-token) SHOULD be enough to uniquely identify the original message.
- original-message-received (x - Unix_Timestamp64)
- The message-received header of the message that this one supersedes. This key should only be present if supersedes is also present. It MAY be used as a hint in a similar way to original-message-sent.
- pending-message-id (u - Message_ID)
- The incoming message ID. This MUST NOT be present on outgoing messages. Clients SHOULD NOT store this key - it is only valid for as long as the message remains unacknowledged.
- interface (s - DBus_Interface)
- This message is specific to the given interface, which is not Text. It SHOULD be ignored if that interface is not supported. (Note that an 'interface' key can also appear on the second and subsequent parts, where it indicates that that part (only) should be ignored if unsupported.)
- scrollback (b)
- If present and true, the incoming message was part of a replay of message history. This flag does not make sense on outgoing messages and SHOULD NOT appear there.
- rescued (b)
- If present and true, the incoming message has been seen in a previous channel during the lifetime of the Connection, but had not been acknowledged when that channel closed, causing an identical channel (in which the message now appears) to open. It does not make sense on outgoing messages, and SHOULD NOT appear there.
Message_Body_Key — s
Well-known keys for the second and subsequent Message_Parts of a message, which contain the message content, along with the corresponding value types.
- identifier (s — Protocol_Content_Identifier)
- An opaque identifier for this part. Parts of a message MAY reference other parts by treating this identifier as if it were a MIME Content-ID and using the cid: URI scheme.
- alternative (s)
-
If present, this part of the message is an alternative for all other parts with the same value for "alternative". Clients SHOULD only display one of them (this is expected to be used for XHTML messages in a future version of this specification).
If omitted, this part is not an alternative for any other part.
Parts of a message MAY reference the group of alternatives as a whole (i.e. a reference to whichever of them is chosen) by treating this identifier as if it were the MIME Content-ID of a multipart/alternative part, and using the cid: URI scheme.
- content-type (s)
-
The MIME type of this part. See the documentation for MessageReceived and MessageSent for notes on the special status of "text/plain" parts.
Connection managers MUST NOT signal parts without a 'content-type' key; if a protocol provides no way to determine the MIME type, the connection manager is responsible for guessing it, but MAY fall back to "text/plain" for text and "application/octet-stream" for non-text.
Clients MUST ignore parts without a 'content-type' key, which are reserved for future expansion.
When sending messages, clients SHOULD normalize the content-type to lower case, but connection managers SHOULD NOT rely on this. When signalling sent or received messages, connection managers MUST normalize the content-type to lower case.
- lang (s)
- The natural language of this part, identified by a
RFC 3066 language tag.
Rationale:
XMPP allows alternative-selection by language as well as by content-type. - size (u)
- The size in bytes (if needs-retrieval is true, this MAY be an
estimated or approximate size). SHOULD be omitted if 'content'
is provided.
Rationale:
There's no point in providing the size if you're already providing all the content. - thumbnail (b)
-
This part is a thumbnail. To represent an image together with its thumbnail in a single message, there should be one part for the full image followed by a part for the thumbnail (following the “more complete versions first” requirement), with the same 'alternative' value. For example:
[ ... , { 'alternative': 'catphoto', 'content-type': 'image/jpeg', 'size': 150000, 'content': [0xFF, 0xD8, ... 0xFF 0xD9], }, { 'alternative': 'catphoto', 'content-type': 'image/jpeg' 'size': 1024, 'thumbnail': True, 'content': [0xFF, 0xD8, ... 0xFF 0xD9], }, ... ]
- needs-retrieval (b)
- If false or omitted, the connection
manager already holds this part in memory. If present and true,
this part must be retrieved on demand (like MIME's
message/external-body) by a mechanism to be defined later.
Rationale:
The mechanism was meant to be the now-deprecated GetPendingMessageContent, but that didn't work out. It's worth leaving the header in in preparation for a future mechanism. - truncated (b)
- The content available via the 'content' key has been truncated by the server or connection manager (equivalent to Channel_Text_Message_Flag_Truncated in the Text interface).
- content (s or ay)
- The part's content, if it is available and sufficiently small to include here (implies that 'needs-retrieval' is false or omitted). Otherwise, omitted. If the part is human-readable text or HTML, the value for this key MUST be a UTF-8 string (D-Bus signature 's'). If the part is not text, the value MUST be a byte-array (D-Bus signature 'ay'). If the part is a text-based format that is not the main body of the message (e.g. an iCalendar or an attached XML document), the value SHOULD be a UTF-8 string, transcoding from another charset to UTF-8 if necessary, but MAY be a byte-array (of unspecified character set) if transcoding fails or the source charset is not known.
- interface (s - DBus_Interface)
- This part is specific to the given interface, which is not Text. It SHOULD be ignored if that interface is not supported. (Note that an 'interface' key can also appear on the first part, where it indicates that the entire message should be ignored if unsupported.)
Delivery_Report_Header_Key — s
Well-known keys for the first Message_Part of a delivery report, along with the corresponding value types. Some of these are special-cases of headers defined by Message_Header_Key.
- message-sender (u - Contact_Handle, as defined by Message_Header_Key)
- MUST be the intended recipient of the original message, if available (zero or omitted if the intended recipient is unavailable or is not a contact, e.g. a chatroom), even if the delivery report actually came from an intermediate server.
- message-type (u - Channel_Text_Message_Type, as defined by Message_Header_Key)
- MUST be Channel_Text_Message_Type_Delivery_Report.
- delivery-status (u - Delivery_Status)
- The status of the message. All delivery reports MUST contain this key in the first Message_Part.
- delivery-token (s - Protocol_Message_Token)
-
An identifier for the message to which this delivery report refers. MUST NOT be an empty string. Omitted if not available.
Clients may match this against the token produced by the SendMessage method and MessageSent signal. A status report with no token could match any sent message, and a sent message with an empty token could match any status report. If multiple sent messages match, clients SHOULD use some reasonable heuristic.
Rationale:
In an ideal world, we could unambiguously match reports against messages; however, deployed protocols are not ideal, and not all reports and messages can be matched. - delivery-error (u - Channel_Text_Send_Error)
- The reason for the failure. MUST be omitted if this was a successful delivery; SHOULD be omitted if it would be Channel_Text_Send_Error_Unknown.
- delivery-dbus-error (s - DBus_Error_Name)
- The reason for the failure, specified as a (possibly implementation-specific) D-Bus error. MUST be omitted if this was a successful delivery. If set, the 'delivery-error' key SHOULD be set to the closest available value.
- delivery-error-message (s)
- Debugging information on why the message could not be delivered. MUST be omitted if this was a successful delivery; MAY always be omitted.
- delivery-echo (aa{sv} - Message_Part[])
-
The message content which can be omitted if no content is available. Content MAY have been truncated, message parts MAY have been removed, and message parts MAY have had their content removed (i.e. the message part metadata is present, but the 'content' key is not).
Rationale:
Some protocols, like XMPP, echo the failing message back to the sender. This is sometimes the only way to match it against the sent message, so we include it here.
Protocol_Message_Token — s
An opaque token used to identify messages in the underlying. protocol. As a special case, the empty string indicates that there is no particular identification for a message.
CM implementations SHOULD use an identifier expected to be unique, such as a UUID, for outgoing messages (if possible).
Some protocols can only track a limited number of messages in a small message-ID space (SMS messages are identified by a single byte), and some implementations send non-unique identifiers (some XMPP clients use very simple message IDs, such as an incrementing integer that resets to 1 at the beginning of each connection). As a result, clients MUST NOT assume that protocol tokens will not be re-used.
In particular, clients SHOULD use a heuristic to assign delivery reports to messages, such as matching on message content or timestamp (if available), or assuming that the delivery report refers to the most recent message with that ID.
Protocol_Content_Identifier — s
A protocol-specific identifier for a blob of content, as used for the identifier key in a Message_Part. The same identifier MAY be re-used if the same content, byte-for-byte, appears as a part of several messages.
Rationale:
On XMPP, these identifiers might be Content-IDs for custom smileys implemented using XEP-0232 Bits of Binary; the same smiley might well appear in multiple messages.
Channel_Text_Send_Error — u
- Unknown (0)
- Offline (1)
- Invalid_Contact (2)
- Permission_Denied (3)
- Too_Long (4)
- Not_Implemented (5)
Channel_Text_Message_Type — u
- Normal (0)
- Action (1)
- Notice (2)
- Auto_Reply (3)
- Delivery_Report (4)
Delivery_Status — u
The status of a message as indicated by a delivery report.
If this enum is extended in future specifications, this should only be to add new, non-overlapping conditions (i.e. all failures should still be signalled as either Temporarily_Failed or Permanently_Failed). If additional detail is required (e.g. distinguishing between the various types of permanent failure) this will be done using additional Delivery_Report_Header_Keys.
- Unknown (0)
- Delivered (1)
- Temporarily_Failed (2)
- Permanently_Failed (3)
- Accepted (4)
- Read (5)
- Deleted (6)
Rationale:
Rationale:
Rationale:
Read
if the message was read before being deleted.
Message_Part_Support_Flags — u
Flags indicating the level of support for message parts on this channel. They are designed such that setting more flags always implies that the channel has more capabilities.
If no flags are set, this indicates that messages may contain a single message part whose content-type is any of the types from SupportedContentTypes, possibly with some alternatives.
There is no flag indicating support for alternatives. This is because the SendMessage implementation can always accept messages containing alternatives, even if the underlying protocol does not, by deleting all alternatives except the first (most preferred) that is supported.
Rationale:
See SupportedContentTypes for some examples.
- One_Attachment (1)
- Multiple_Attachments (2)
Message_Sending_Flags — u
- Report_Delivery (1)
- Report_Read (2)
- Report_Deleted (4)
Provide a successful delivery report if possible, even if this is not the default for this protocol. Ignored if delivery reports are not possible on this protocol.
Rationale:
In some protocols, like XMPP, it is not conventional to request or send positive delivery notifications.
Delivery failure reports SHOULD always be sent, but if this flag is present, the connection manager MAY also try harder to obtain failed delivery reports or allow them to be matched to outgoing messages.
Provide a delivery report when the message is read by the recipient, even if this is not the default for this protocol. Ignored if read reports are not possible on this protocol.
Provide a delivery report when the message is deleted by the recipient, even if this is not the default for this protocol. Ignored if such reports are not possible on this protocol.
Delivery_Reporting_Support_Flags — u
Rationale:
- Receive_Failures (1)
- Receive_Successes (2)
- Receive_Read (4)
- Receive_Deleted (8)
Read
reports if Message_Sending_Flag_Report_Read
is specified when sending.
Deleted
reports if Message_Sending_Flag_Report_Deleted
is specified when sending.
Message_Part — a{sv}
Part of a message's content. In practice, this mapping never appears in isolation: incoming messages are represented by a list of Message_Part mappings in the MessageReceived signal, and outgoing messages are passed to SendMessage as a list of these mappings.
The first part of the message contains "headers", which refer to the entire message. The second and subsequent parts contain the message's content, including plain text, formatted text and/or attached files. Well-known keys for the header and body parts are defined by the Message_Header_Key and Message_Body_Key types, respectively. It is an error for a connection manager to put keys referring to the message as a whole in the second or subsequent Message_Part, or keys intended for body parts in the first Message_Part; clients MUST recover from this error by ignoring these mis-placed keys.
Rationale:
Instead of representing messages as aa{sv} where the first dictionary is special (a dictionary of headers), we could have used a signature like (a{sv}aa{sv}) to separate out the headers and the body parts.
However, this would make access to the messages more awkward.
In Python, the syntax for access to a header field would remain
message[0]['message-type']
, but access to a body
field in the second body part would change from
message[2]['content'] to message[1][1]['content']
. In
GLib, the message would change from being a
GPtrArray(GHashTable)
to being a
GValueArray(GHashTable, GPtrArray(GHashTable))
which
is rather inconvenient to dereference.
In any group of parts with the same non-empty value for the alternative key (which represent alternative versions of the same content), more faithful versions of the intended message MUST come before less faithful versions (note that this order is the opposite of MIME multipart/alternative parts). Clients SHOULD display the first alternative that they understand.
Rationale:
Specifying the preference order means that if the underlying protocol doesn't support alternatives, the CM can safely delete everything apart from the first supported alternative when sending messages.
The order is the reverse of MIME because MIME's rationale for placing the "plainest" part first (legibility in pre-MIME UAs) does not apply to us, and placing the most preferred part first simplifies display (a client can iterate the message in order, display the first alternative that it understands, and skip displaying all subsequent parts with the same "alternative" key).
Clients SHOULD present all parts that are not redundant alternatives in the order they appear in this array, possibly excluding parts that are referenced by another displayed part. It is implementation-specific how the parts are presented to the user.
Rationale:
This allows CMs to assume that all parts are actually shown to the user, even if they are not explicitly referenced - we do not yet recommend formatted text, and there is no way for plain text to reference an attachment since it has no concept of markup or references. This also forces clients to do something sensible with messages that consist entirely of "attachments", with no "body" at all.
For instance, when displaying the above example, a client that understands the HTML part should display the JPEG image once, between the two lines "Here is a photo of my cat:" and "Isn't it cute?"; it may additionally present the image in some way for a second time, after "Isn't it cute?", or may choose not to.
A client that does not understand HTML, displaying the same message, should display the plain-text part, followed by the JPEG image.
Connection managers, clients and extensions to this specification
SHOULD NOT include Handles as values in a
Message_Part, except for message-sender
in the
header.
Rationale:
Reference-counting handles in clients becomes problematic if the channel proxy cannot know whether particular map values are handles or not.
Example messages
A rich-text message, with an embedded image, might be represented as:
[ { 'message-token': '9de9546a-3400-4419-a505-3ea270cb834c', 'message-sender': 42, 'message-sent': 1210067943, 'message-received': 1210067947, 'message-type': 0, # = Channel_Text_Message_Type_Normal 'pending-message-id': 437, }, { 'alternative': 'main', 'content-type': 'text/html', 'content': 'Here is a photo of my cat:<br />' + '<img src="cid:catphoto" alt="lol!" />' + '<br />Isn't it cute?', }, { 'alternative': 'main', 'content-type': 'text/plain', 'content': 'Here is a photo of my cat:\n[IMG: lol!]\nIsn't it cute?', }, { 'identifier': 'catphoto', 'content-type': 'image/jpeg', 'size': 101000, 'needs-retrieval': True, }, ]
telepathy-ring, Nokia's GSM connection manager, represents vCards sent via SMS as:
[ { 'message-token': '9de9546a-3400-4419-a505-3ea270cb834c', 'message-sender': 42, 'message-sent': 1210067943, 'message-received': 1210067947, 'message-type': 0, # = Channel_Text_Message_Type_Normal 'pending-message-id': 437, }, { 'content-type': 'text/x-vcard', 'content': [ 0x66, 0x69, 0x71, ...], # vCard data as an array of bytes }, ]
Delivery reports
Delivery reports are also represented as messages with the message-type header mapping to Channel_Text_Message_Type Delivery_Report. Delivery reports SHOULD contain the message-sender header, mapping to the intended recipient of the original message, if possible; other headers specific to delivery reports are defined by the Delivery_Report_Header_Key type. The second and subsequent parts, if present, are a human-readable report from the IM service.
The result of attempting to send delivery reports using SendMessage is currently undefined.
Example delivery reports
- A minimal delivery report indicating permanent failure of the
sent message whose token was
b9a991bd-8845-4d7f-a704-215186f43bb4
for an unknown reason [{ # header 'message-sender': 123, 'message-type': Channel_Text_Message_Type_Delivery_Report, 'delivery-status': Delivery_Status_Permanently_Failed, 'delivery-token': 'b9a991bd-8845-4d7f-a704-215186f43bb4', } # no body ]
- A delivery report where the failed message is echoed back to the sender rather than being referenced by ID, and the failure reason is that this protocol cannot send messages to offline contacts such as the contact with handle 123
[{ # header 'message-sender': 123, 'message-type': Channel_Text_Message_Type_Delivery_Report, 'delivery-status': Delivery_Status_Temporarily_Failed, 'delivery-error': Channel_Text_Send_Error_Offline, 'delivery-echo': [{ # header of original message 'message-sender': 1, 'message-sent': 1210067943, }, { # body of original message 'content-type': 'text/plain', 'content': 'Hello, world!', }] ], # no body ]
- A maximally complex delivery report: the server reports a
bilingual human-readable failure message because the user sent
a message "Hello, world!" with token
b9a991bd-8845-4d7f-a704-215186f43bb4
to a contact with handle 123, but that handle represents a contact who does not actually exist [{ # header 'message-sender': 123, 'message-type': Channel_Text_Message_Type_Delivery_Report, 'delivery-status': Delivery_Status_Permanently_Failed, 'delivery-error': Channel_Text_Send_Error_Invalid_Contact, 'delivery-token': 'b9a991bd-8845-4d7f-a704-215186f43bb4', 'delivery-echo': [{ # header of original message 'message-sender': 1, 'message-sent': 1210067943, }, { # body of original message 'content-type': 'text/plain', 'content': 'Hello, world!', }] ], }, { # message from server (alternative in English) 'alternative': '404', 'content-type': 'text/plain', 'lang': 'en', 'content': 'I have no contact with that name', }, { # message from server (alternative in German) 'alternative': '404'. 'content-type': 'text/plain', 'lang': 'de', 'content', 'Ich habe keinen Kontakt mit diesem Namen', } ]
- A minimal delivery report indicating successful delivery
of the sent message whose token was
b9a991bd-8845-4d7f-a704-215186f43bb4
[{ # header 'message-sender': 123, 'message-type': Channel_Text_Message_Type_Delivery_Report, 'delivery-status': Delivery_Status_Delivered, 'delivery-token': 'b9a991bd-8845-4d7f-a704-215186f43bb4', } # no body ]
- Key — s
- Value — v