12:01 uis: Thank you very much for your work.
12:27 uis: (Who knew Vasyans from opennet were this good?)))
13:50 enunes: anarsoul: indeed thanks for all this work :)
13:51 enunes: anarsoul: I started looking into the optimizer one but there seem to be some debug leftovers, is that still in some wip state?
13:52 enunes: also I think it would be best to fold the commit which fixes the deqp tests with the CI updates rather than a separate commit
16:41 anarsoul[m]: I kind of hoped to avoid running deqp for each of the commits since I have no idea what fixed these tests :)
17:22 anarsoul: enunes: these aren't really debug leftovers
17:22 anarsoul: I'll move assigning discard block index into a separate commit though
17:23 anarsoul: (and it doesn't have to be INT_MAX, it can be the last block + 1 index)
17:43 anarsoul: uis: I haven't been on opennet for a over a decade. Let's say I have conflicting political views with opennet's administration
17:44 uis: You replied to my post in 2020 about panfrost.
17:46 anarsoul: oh really? ok, then half a decade
17:48 anarsoul: (I just checked and it looks like opennet is blocking Canadian IPs. heh)
20:09 anarsoul: ppir_add_write_after_read_deps() bites me again
20:09 anarsoul: it doesn't account partial reg reads/writes and as a result may create a circular dependency
20:10 anarsoul: *doesn't account for
22:12 anarsoul: oof, it's actualy a different issue :\
22:13 anarsoul: I'd say our comp->var_nodes[] usage is completely broken
22:14 anarsoul: well, not completely
22:14 anarsoul: but broken
22:58 anarsoul: enunes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/33681 somehow it doesn't have any fixes in CI. I guess having an array with sparse usage hid the issue