01:11DemiMarie: DavidHeidelberg: see you at XDC2024!
13:17DavidHeidelberg: DemiMarie: u too! :)
13:17DemiMarie: DavidHeidelberg: thanks!
13:58bluetail: This may be a silly question. Does the XDC event have a dresscode or can people literally show up like they want?
14:03Company: bluetail: XDC events have photos and videos, so if you want to get a feel what people wear, google it
14:03bluetail: eh, I googled already, boring. I wanted to know if there were any outliers, like dinosaurs :D
14:04mripard: there's been witches a couple of times, but no dinosaurs afaik
14:05HdkR: Dress super fancy, show everyone up. Look dapper AF
14:06mripard: to actually answer your question, I don't think that there's any dress code
14:10bluetail: Thats great. Imagine a panelist coming as https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/91w-z3hEn9L._AC_SX522_.jpg :D.... But enough fun and jokes now. I know you guys actually need to get work done.
14:17karolherbst: if you want to come as a dinosaur, go for it
14:18karolherbst: though I can't guaranteed that the doors are small enough
14:18HdkR: Would definitely be a talking point
14:18karolherbst: dinner gotta be fun
14:22DavidHeidelberg: Extinction of dinosaurs solved - they couldn't pass the small door to get into dining room.
14:36daniels: bluetail: the dress code is 'wear clothes'
14:41dj-death: daniels :)
14:57karolherbst: mhh, does that include or exclude costumes or comparable stuff...
14:58karolherbst: though I'd hope people wear clothers underneath anyway
15:02Company: is dinosaur underwear okay?
15:07alyssa: 14:04 <mripard> there's been witches a couple of times, but no dinosaurs afaik
15:07alyssa:sweats
15:10ccr: :)
15:10ccr: alyssa is a dinosaur in disguise? :o
15:10karolherbst: (we have other potential witches, don't worry)
15:11HdkR: I might be considered a dinosaur at this point
15:11karolherbst: 🦖
15:14ccr: me too, at least on the accord of sticking to using Xorg ..
15:20alyssa: i use wayland
15:24ccr: sounds like witchery
15:27clarifiedonce: So how to get intermediate results of IO, in a mode that does not use access as data procedures? It's that you have a format of the hash so depending on whether you order -72 and remove 883 so that 184 is not lifted to, you include 443 for the second run, which removes any of the intermediate results after a hotspot at pc. As for example -72 is shielded by 443-256-115, even though one
15:27clarifiedonce: loaded all operands to the hash and -70 is lifted to 186-120 is 66 so 446+1024-888-66 is 446+70 so 516....., so second run -72 get shielded, but 70 would not be, you still load all operands. It's pretty perverse tbh. not as perverse as your perverse spam but might or even should function. So you remove 883 from minuend, and 888 from subtrahend and add 1024 to subtrahend, and add all
15:27clarifiedonce: operands to minuend to get there and format of the hash provides a climpse at which pc results to remove.
16:15alyssa: kinda tempted to symlink src/gallium/drivers/asahi to src/asahi/gl
16:15alyssa: for grep & sed reasons
16:43clarifiedonce: i technically have tested all the data access also, and this is pretty short talk too, but need to sail somewhere to next year to have the first alpha compiler and filesystem, i have all eggs in one basket, but all the times something interrupts me and disturbs me, such as broken things meaning additional costs, abusive people needing treatment etc. I do not want to share my work with
16:43clarifiedonce: them. But i would not put all the eggs into one basket if the basket would not carry, i know it would work and it would be only way to build my own happy world.