00:43luxgrumvey: This function seems to be not failing here. I can extract as much values as i need in it's data mode. All it essentially does is ask for how many inverse bits minus from maximum gets to and this gets taken from 883for 115+1 so it asks that 15is the bits then if you get to 898 and subtract twice smaller maximum/focal index.
00:54luxgrumvey: now it is possible to perform the unthinkable from before such as low-power batched ultra performant execution when laying out the code structures..
08:25tzimmermann: hi! could someone rubberstamp the trivial include fix at https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20241011144632.90434-2-tzimmermann@suse.de/ ?
11:30mlankhorst: airlied: is it still useful to send a drm-misc-fixes pull request or shall I skip this week?
11:31mlankhorst: seems to have some dma-buf sealing checks, Kconfig fixes, dma-buf debugfs fix and some panel fixes
11:31mlankhorst: and sima^
11:36javierm: tzimmermann: r-b from me. Do you need a Fixes: tag for stable to pick it up ?
11:58diracdiodes: rest of that should not be carrying wide complexity and hence can be solved while typing in the code. Calulation such as how many banks, how many instructions in a batch then carry the parameter through by reverse elimination, so 883 remains then +15, then -58 or -60 to get you an answer from 883 minus 768 too, and your talks about a parrot who has mental illness are not something
11:58diracdiodes: welcomed since crookes you are nutbolts. I must write the filesystem or else i never earn a spot in something that is also worth to be performing. Filesystem starts from bitcoin tree as to why i have not much to add.
12:06diracdiodes: it's not gonna be years of such fortune that i implement code for you, because i have just enough of momentum and resources to cover only myself.
12:08diracdiodes: so if the systems are unchangeable for you than that is how it is. I did not work for dry outcome, i earn a bit resoures back, and have a motivational and strategic fork or split from that of your crews. Why should I praise the nutbolts, i kick you everywhere out where you arrive just like you behave.
12:33tzimmermann: javierm, thanks, but which patch? :)
12:45tzimmermann: javierm, the include fix?
13:14javierm: tzimmermann: yes, the include fix
13:14tzimmermann: ok, thanks a lot
13:18tzimmermann: i don't think fixes is needed
13:21javierm: tzimmermann: ok
16:11diracdiodes: If none of the official specs lead to desired outcomes, due to wear designing likely, then what makes sense is to roll your own spec i elaborate on that term, it goes through a function that got derived by solving lemmas of a larger theorem after subsituting the input data to subtract back. Hence it can do coalascing of one arithmetic to two. The condition is index which is twice per
16:11diracdiodes: focal index, and hence the single to be removed to have only one index can be coalesced to condition by substituting it to integral parts Hence we are getting the real and unique answers out from where they were indexed And since we want to only select one, by including 883 offset we get to add 15 and remove 58 we get the original presentation, cause we had second level derivate or
16:11diracdiodes: something function that can have two terms to subtitute from that coalesce into new.
23:32lumag: mlankhorst, tzimmermann, mripard: A question regarding https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20241206-drm-connector-eld-mutex-v2-0-c9bce1ee8bea@linaro.org/ . Granted the lack of response from AMD I'm tempted to pick up the rest of the patches and resend AMDgpu and radeon.